• Home
  • Posts RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • Edit
  • The Allegory of Creation

    Tuesday, January 12, 2016

    “And YHVH Elohim planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed.”

    As we have come to learn, the Torah is nothing more than a metaphysical handbook, the individual biography of every being born on the planet. It’s a guide that details the many mental and spiritual states we find ourselves occupying during every waking moment of our lives.

    I don’t know what your understanding of Eden is, but chances are that you’ve come to know it as God’s magical garden where he placed Adam and Eve, both of whom then went on to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil – a big no-no in the eyes of HaShem.

    Scientifically (and metaphysically) speaking, we can look at the Creator as simply a nonlocal, multidimensional ‘event’ that developed conscious awareness and ‘asked’ itself why it was. In order to explore this question, the nonlocal multidimensional event individualized itself and generated our local, ‘physical’ three-dimensional reality (governed by space and time).

    This being the case, where exactly does ‘Eden’ fit in? Furthermore, who on earth are Adam and Eve?
    In order to answer these questions, we must remember again to look at the Torah as a metaphysical guide concerning the various states of consciousness.

    Firstly, ‘Eden’ is not a garden. It’s not actually a place at all. Eden represents a ‘pleasant, harmonious state of consciousness’ leading to growth (that’s where the garden bit comes in). Further, in scriptural symbolism, east always represents the within, so what we have is a pleasant, harmonious state of consciousness (Eden) within us (located in the east).


    “And out of the ground made YHVH Elohim to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.”

    Trees represent thoughts of unity. One small thought or idea grows and spreads out, becoming a symbol of strength in which high, spiritual ideals can ‘roost’. Trees are also widely interpreted metaphysically as being the nerves of the body of man, the connecting links between earth and heaven, body and mind.

    Within the state of ‘Eden’ can be found “the tree of the knowledge of good and evil”. Now, this ‘tree’ represents our ability to measure purpose, our ability to assign values to purpose. All things ‘good’ are an expression of purpose, while all things ‘evil’ are things that contribute to the measurement of a lack of purpose.

    The other main ‘tree’ that sits in ‘Eden’ is the tree of life. The tree of life represents pure being, existence free of the measurement of purpose. In fact, in a way, the tree of life exists as a result of our individual measurements of purpose.

    This ‘tree of life’ is the default basic state of conscious awareness, the state we share with the nonlocal multidimensional event (NME). Even though we are individualized from the NME, we are still connected to our place of origin, which is represented by this tree of life.

    “And YHVH Elohim commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden you may freely eat: But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, you shall not eat of it: for in the day that you eat thereof you shall surely die.”

    When we become individualized in order to measure purpose, we ‘eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil’ and are cast out of the default pleasant, harmonious state of consciousness that we are born into (spiritually).

    When we eat from the tree, we ‘die’ – become separated from the NME – we achieve free will in order to measure purpose, we are ‘born’ into an ego.

    Man can only regain entry into ‘Eden’ by being ‘born anew’ in spirit – a spirit that is closely associated with the pleasant, harmonious state of consciousness – a state which can come about voluntarily while we are ‘alive’, but is more generally experienced via the ‘death’ of the  physical body.

    We eat the fruit of the tree of life when we appropriate ideas of divine existence, ceasing to see life as something that comes and goes, something that consists of a ‘birth’ and a ‘death’.
    The spirit never dies.

    Which brings us to ‘Adam’ and ‘Eve…’

    Adam represents the ego or will, the Spiritual existing in the physical – the soul, the intellect. On the other hand, Eve represents feeling, and is most associated with love.

    Both Adam and Eve together represent the individualized ‘I AM’ consciousness – the conscious awareness of every man and woman. We all have a rational, thinking side, and an emotional side that counteracts it. This is where the old idea of letting your heart rule your head comes from – Eve, tempted by the serpent (which represents desire, by the way), eats the fruit and tells Adam to do the same.

    This entire metaphysical interpretation is fascinating in that it explains why we are here, what caused us to become individualized, and how our feelings (Eve) can over-rule our head (Adam) and are in turn influenced and driven by our desires (the serpent).

    Again, the serpent represents the fact that all desires are the lowest forms of thought, above which are higher concepts and ideas to do with self and spirituality (lowest forms of thought because they are focused on the material world, a world outside of us).

    “And I will put enmity between you and the woman.”

    Ever wondered why you get so frustrated and have an almost love/hate relationship with your desires? It’s because there exists animosity, a state of hatred, hostility, antagonism between the ‘serpent’ and ‘Eve’.

    In the Torah, this was portrayed as the result of punishing the serpent for leading Eve astray. Metaphysically speaking, when we allow our emotions to dictate our focus and attention on desires, there will always be an element of love in the first instance, followed by the antagonistic follow-up when our desires don’t show up.

    0 comments:

    Post a Comment

    We appreciate your comments, questions & general input.